Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Site ActionsUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open Menu Navigate Up
Sign In

Quick Launch

   
View: 

1. The Lab Design and Structure

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)220223322
The objectives of the lab are clear
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1111224411
The lab is well-structured
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)112204422
The practical part of the content is supported well with relevant examples
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)220115611
Links with relevant disciplines (Engineering and non-engineering) is clear
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 9

2. Workload and Content

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly ِِِِAgree
(%)112205611
The workload of the lab is appropriate for the assigned credit hours
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)011334411
I am confident that the subject content of the lab is up-to-date
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)022223322
Prerequisites to take the lab are appropriate
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)011223333
There is not overlap with other labs in the program
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 9

3. Resources

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)011224422
Equipment are effectively designed
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)01106722
The equipment link between theory and practical issues
   
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)011224422
The teaching resources (textbooks, handouts, and Web resources) are appropriate for the lab
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1111113333
The lab manual is clear
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 9

4. Instructors

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)011223333
The topics covered are explained well
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)022114422
The use of teaching aids and media is appropriate
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)022114422
The instructor displayed a good knowledge of the subjects covered
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)022113333
The instructor motivates my interest in the subject.
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)022114422
The instructor communicates the material effectively
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)02205622
The instructor is easily approachable following the lab to answer questions (for example, personally or via email)
   
 
   
 
 
 
12345

Total: 9

5. Overall Quality

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)1111115611
I would recommend this lab to other students
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1111114422
The lab has motivated me to continue exploring the subject area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1111224411
There is a positive atmosphere of ‘learning together’ in the lab
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)01106722
This lab is important for my career
   
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)011115622
The physical teaching and learning environment (lecture rooms, laboratories etc.) were of high quality
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)011225611
The lab has significantly increased my knowledge in the subject area
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)112204422
I am confident that I can apply what I have learned in the lab
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1111112233
Examination standards were made clear in the lab.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)111103333
I was well-motivated to attend all experiments and activities on this lab
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)01105633
Working and learning collaboratively in groups was actively encouraged
   
 
   
 
 
 
12345

Total: 9

6. What recommendations would you make to further improve the lab?

 nothing
 (33%) 
 
 no thing
 (17%) 
 
 more about the 3 phase generation
 (17%) 
 
 every thing is clear
 (17%) 
 
 
 (17%) 
 

Total: 6

7. What aspects of this lab were most useful for you?

 pscad program
 (17%) 
 
 no thing
 (17%) 
 
 nothing
 (17%) 
 
 i like the part about transmission in general
 (17%) 
 
 the transmission part
 (17%) 
 
 
 (17%) 
 

Total: 6