Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Site ActionsUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open Menu Navigate Up
Sign In

Quick Launch

   
View: 

1. Participant


Total: 0

2. The Course Design and Structure

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)08155423
The objectives of the course are clear
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)23015548
The course is well-structured
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08311538
The practical part of the content is supported well with relevant examples
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)88383115
Links with relevant disciplines (Engineering and non-engineering) is clear
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)158312315
Lecture and non-lecture content is well integrated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

3. Workload and Content

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)311531158
The workload of the course is appropriate for the assigned credit hours.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0884638
I am confident that the subject content of the course is up-to-date
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)231583815
Prerequisites to take the course are appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)152315388
There is not overlap with other courses in the program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

4. Resources

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)88313123
Handouts are effectively designed to complement each lecture
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)1515153815
The teaching resources (textbooks, handouts, and Web resources) are appropriate for the course
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)158233123
Reading lists and references are linked to reading resources that are readily available
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

5. Instructors

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)1515231531
The instructor times the presentation of lectures effectively
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)015233131
The topics covered are explained well
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08154631
The use of teaching aids and media is appropriate
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0006931
The instructor displayed a good knowledge of the subjects covered
       
 
 
 
 12345
(%)81504631
The instructor motivates my interest in the subject.
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)80233831
The instructor communicates the material effectively
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00231562
The instructor is easily approachable following the lecture to answer questions (for example, personally or via email)
     
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

6. Overall Quality

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)3115151523
I would recommend this course to other students
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)31831238
The course has motivated me to continue exploring the subject area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)238153815
There is a positive atmosphere of ‘learning together’ in the lectures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08234623
This course is important for my career
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08155423
The physical teaching and learning environment (lecture rooms, laboratories etc.) were of high quality
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)158233123
The course has significantly increased my knowledge in the subject area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)150233823
I am confident that I can apply what I have learned in the course
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)150313815
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)82323318
I was well-motivated to attend all lectures and activities on this course
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)81584623
Working and learning collaboratively in groups was actively encouraged
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

7. Summary

  
Totally Disagree
Totally Agree
(%)08383123
The quality of the course is high.
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)815233815
I think that I have increased my knowledge through the lecture considerably.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)15023548
I think I can apply what I have learned in the lecture.
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8806223
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)88382315
I assimilated the subject matter of this course mainly through the 1 = attending lecture 2 = attending exercises, 3 = reading script/ other handouts for the lecture, 4 = reading literature, 5 = working in learning group
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

8. What recommendations would you make to further improve the course?

 the time management in the course lacked experience.
 (8%) 
 
 I think that giving lectures on how to use the simulation softwares in the lab is important. also it is not preferable to explain theory of power electronics inside the lab.
 (8%) 
 
 prelabs need to be reduced
 (8%) 
 
 dealing with the ripple
 (8%) 
 
 we need to improve the fullwave and half wave rectefire
 (8%) 
 
 Online Report Or something to reach the graphs without hind draw
 (8%) 
 
 inverter operation with signal modulation
 (8%) 
 
 The material should be syncronised with the Power Electronics course, the instruments need to be renewed,
 (8%) 
 
 Power electronics class should be a prerequisite for this lab, it shouldn't be allowed for a student to take them simultaneously. I would prefer if you could see what is happening inside the models and equipment.
 (8%) 
 
 the component
 (8%) 
 
 the puck and boost part
 (8%) 
 
 they should decrease the number of prelab and the practical side is too long. and they no need to do a presentation.
 (8%) 
 
 rectifiers
 (8%) 
 

Total: 13

9. What aspects of this course were most useful for you?

 experience gained in using the lab equipments.
 (8%) 
 
 the simulation softwares (provided that we were capable of using them)
 (8%) 
 
 non it was full of overwork
 (8%) 
 
 full wave rectifier
 (8%) 
 
 the DC-DC converter
 (8%) 
 
 this lab should taken after the PE Cource
 (8%) 
 
 full wave rectifier
 (8%) 
 
 The instructor is great, he is very energetic and enthusiastic about the course, motivates the students, explains everything very well. Very apporchable and I would recommend him.
 (8%) 
 
 The engineer was insightful and very helpful.
 (8%) 
 
 the experiment was to strong
 (8%) 
 
 the converting from AC to DC part
 (8%) 
 
 inverter operation
 (8%) 
 

Total: 12